Tuesday, July 5, 2005
Member since:
May 2004
May 2004
As we all know, even a picture taken from a cheap digital camera has more definition than a single frame taken with a 1080 Digital Movie cam. As i was examining a Canon SLR that a friend of mine bought yesterday, the following question came in mind:
How realistic is for a company to configure a digital camera of that caliber (Canon SLR) to take 24 pictures per second in its medium or highest resolution? wouldn't that be a true competitor for the all mighty film? After that, you download them into a pc, and a special software "stucks them together" as 1 big file, containing the Movie. Manipulation is MUCH MORE EASIER, you can tweak each and every frame in its full splendor sepperately, storage is not problem, there are allready memory cards that are actual converters that lead into 40 and 80 gb hard drives. So... Why all the fuss with the blured and stupid DV?
The above might sound incredibly stupid to a tech guy's ear, but i would like an answear. thank you.
How realistic is for a company to configure a digital camera of that caliber (Canon SLR) to take 24 pictures per second in its medium or highest resolution? wouldn't that be a true competitor for the all mighty film? After that, you download them into a pc, and a special software "stucks them together" as 1 big file, containing the Movie. Manipulation is MUCH MORE EASIER, you can tweak each and every frame in its full splendor sepperately, storage is not problem, there are allready memory cards that are actual converters that lead into 40 and 80 gb hard drives. So... Why all the fuss with the blured and stupid DV?
The above might sound incredibly stupid to a tech guy's ear, but i would like an answear. thank you.
