HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray, and other matters....
Want to make a post? LOG ON » with your free my town account or SIGN UP NOW » (Takes less than 60 seconds)
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4
Want to make a post? LOG ON » with your free my town account or SIGN UP NOW » (Takes less than 60 seconds)
Search the entire site
Latest posts
AVATAR confirmed for April 22nd on DVD and Blu-ray »
Mar 18, 2010 - CDT 8:13 AM
"OZ" the next Harry Potter!!! »
Mar 18, 2010 - CDT 8:10 AM
Local Blockbuster Closing »
Mar 17, 2010 - CDT 1:31 PM
THE PACIFIC coming to Blu-ray and DVD later this year »
Mar 17, 2010 - CDT 12:38 PM
So here it is... Your TOP 10 most ORIGINAL movies. »
Mar 17, 2010 - CDT 12:23 PM
Rumor of a XBOX 360 Slim - Again »
Mar 17, 2010 - CDT 8:45 AM
3D TV is a Gimmick »
Mar 17, 2010 - CDT 7:13 AM
Hey DVDTOWN staff »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 4:25 PM
Get a Blu-ray player for just $79.99 »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 1:35 PM
Down-streaming: Netflix and the Roku Box »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 11:46 PM
New 'Shrek Forever After' Trailer »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 3:09 PM
GOD OF WAR 3! »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 8:49 AM
New FORD Motors Ad from SNL »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 4:29 PM
Anyone Watching 'Green Zone' This Weekend? »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 10:56 AM
R.I.P. Corey Haim »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 10:32 AM
WAR OF THE WORLDS - Steven Spielberg's remake starring Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning coming to high-def Blu-ray (June 1) »
Mar 12, 2010 - CST 10:48 AM
Sony signs up all six major studios for HD movies on PlayStation Network »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:47 AM
Sony's Blu-ray players do 3D in 1080p even with HDMI 1.3 »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:43 AM
New TRON Trailer »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:38 AM
Mr.Clooney at the Oscars »
Mar 10, 2010 - CST 1:44 PM
RSS feed with latest message board posts »
Message Board Archive »

Electric_Haggis
April 2006
My links
View profile »View wish list »
Feel free to disagree.....
HD-DVD is simply the better format because...
1. Most Blu-Ray releases only feature DVD-quality Dolby Digital, whereas Dolby Digital Plus and TrueHD are the norm on HD-DVD.
2. Too many Blu-Ray titles released with inferior out-dated MPEG2 compression, even to this day. Sure this isn't a big deal when the source material isn't up to scratch, but when it is, VC-1 will simply give you less compression at the same bit-rate. No debate.
3. Blu-Ray is Region-coded... HD-DVD isn't.
4. Blu-Ray is too damn expensive for non die-hards. HD-DVD is much more accessible, with players around half the price, and the X-Box drive at US$200.
5. HD-DVD has a better name!! It's DVD...but HD, get it? Blu-Ray needs explaining. (and what's with Blu-Ray's marketing...."Beyond High Definition"???)
6. It seems HD-DVD is the first to make a triple layer disc ࿓ Gigabytes). Blu-Ray is yet to get there. So Blu-Ray's capacity advantage has been squandered.
7. HD-DVD is more often superior in the extras department. Eg Mission Impossible III.
8. Once again.... HD-DVD is cheaper!! When you consider that Blu-Ray isn't superior in ONE SINGLE ASPECT, it seems ridiculous that you should be paying more for it !
When the war started, I was totally impartial - I was just happy to see HD coming to the masses. In time, I've really turned against Blu-Ray.
Having said all this, I actually think BOTH fomats will survive and coexist, a little like what's happened with DVD-A and SACD. The Warner hybrid discs, support from Windows Vista / Mac OSX Leopard, and dual-format players like the one LG has announced, will help ensure this.
So why do people keep comparing this war to the VHS/Beta battle ?? That was in the eighties, in a climate where only one could survive. It's a different planet now - far more complex, with a lot more to keep both formats alive. It'd much more realistic to compare it to SACD vs DVD-A, or DVD-R vs DVD+R, all of which are still around.
Immediate sales results will still depend on release of "killer aps". A-List titles like Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Bond, etc will have a HUGE impact on sales of either format. So this is what we need to see more of !
One last thing to get off my chest - 1080p is NOT better than 1080i if it's 60p frames a second). I challenge anyone to compare the two and conclude otherwise. What IS better is 1080p at 24 frames a second. 1080p24 will give you cleaner motion, as it runs at the same frame-rate as the original film. Simple as that.
Cheers.
StevePro
June 2006
My links
View profile »View collection »
View wish list »
This is everything that HD-DVD folks have been saying all along neatly wrapped up in one package. You are quite right regarding your comments "killer releases." I find some of the comments on other forums amusing in regard to some very faulty and invalid anaylsis of trend lines on sites such as the DvdWars. One blip toward the blue and some of the fanboys [I really HATE that word] go ballistic, usually immmediatly declaring victory over HD-DVD. It's really getting very tedious. I agree that both formats will probably continue to co-exist for a long time and over that time, trend lines will rise and fall according to what software is being offered at the moment. When Disney releases their BD material in a few months the blue line will go off the chart when the Star Trek stuff comes out later on, the HD line will spike. And then, of course, there is Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings...
Falcon01
July 2006
My links
View profile »View collection »
I don't get this whole format war, it shouldn't even exist but now we're at a point where a lot of consumers have invested into either HD DVD or bluray by purchasing a player and movies so theres no looking back now. I also agree that both formats are going to be around for a while. I doubt very much there will be a clear winner in the near future if at all. Both formats may co-exist until the next best thing comes out.
I'm getting to a point where a don't care if theres no winner. As long as HD DVD is around I'm a happy man and I will keep supporting HD DVD.
[Post edited by Falcon01 on Feb 10, 2007 - CST 11:15 AM]
TwisterZ
May 2006
My links
View profile »View wish list »
"1080p is NOT better than 1080i if it's 60p &#4060 frames a second). I challenge anyone to compare the two and conclude otherwise. What IS better is 1080p at 24 frames a second. 1080p24 will give you cleaner motion, as it runs at the same frame-rate as the original film. Simple as that."
1080p/60 has twice as many frames as 1080i/60, if the original is 60 frames then 1080p/60 will look better and have smoother pans. 1080p/24 is great unless your TV only does 60, if that is the case then your TV will do a 3/2 pull down and slow moving pans will have a jurky motion to them. If your TV can multisync to 72 or 96 frames then you will get a 3/3 or 4/4 pull down and everything will look better.
BruceAmes
April 2006
My links
View profile »Bruce
[Post edited by BruceAmes on Feb 10, 2007 - CST 3:09 PM]
Blurry
September 2006
My links
View profile »View wish list »
Level the playing field and the studios will choose what brings the most value to the consumer. If in the end that turns out to be either format, it is still good since it is being chosen for the right reason.
BruceAmes
April 2006
My links
View profile »[Post edited by BruceAmes on Feb 10, 2007 - CST 4:17 PM]
jamesplath
July 2003
My links
View profile »I agree that both formats will probably survive, and that VHS vs. Beta is probably an unfair comparison. A better one is Macs vs. PCs. And you know what? That competition turned out to be good for consumers of BOTH products. I'm hoping that the competition between HD-DVD and Blu-ray will lead to some great drops in price and even greater innovation. We're already seeing it in the combo players and combo discs.
Love Hendrix!
June 2006
My links
View profile »The larger studio support means more awareness of a slow-growing gap between the number of each format's past top catalog releases [Blu-ray now slowly leading over HD-DVD], along with the occasional new releases (where Blu-ray is clearly more dominant here in '07). Of course, Blu-ray isn't helping itself by releasing catalog titles with barely any of the Special Edition extras that are available on the same in standard DVD (or even HD-DVD).
But with NEW releases, Blu-ray has some heavyweights coming up... the CASINO ROYALE Bond film in March, the Disney "triple play" in May/June of Pixar's CARS, and both PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN movies. And Sony might go for a "home run" this summer, as around the release of the upcoming SPIDERMAN 3 they could bring both of the first two Spiderman movies out on Blu-ray. These were major hits, and for myself, I'm happy with owning both in Superbit DVD editions ($10 each last summer at Best Buy).
And on and on. I'm encouraged that Universal is supporting HD-DVD with many upcoming releases, and that Warner announced last year an '07 release of the classic BLADE RUNNER (WoW! that film will just look stunning on HD-DVD for sure!). And Paramount, Weinstein, and more music discs will be released in HD-DVD (but also Blu-ray). Let's hope the HD-DVD players continue their sales growth worldwide. I'm not worried yet...
-Love Hendrix!
Falcon01
July 2006
My links
View profile »View collection »
Anyway Blade Runner is one of the greatest sci-fi movies of all time. If it came out on HD DVD that would be fantastic BUT it needs some serious remastering first.