Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
September 2007
September 2007
Quote:
100Gb BR drives & media (for backup) are already useless when I can get a brand name external 500Gb USB drive for $99.
agree aswell. i mean this is HD movie playback, who cares about backups, specially at this point.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
August 2007
August 2007
Well I'm sure Sony believed that BR was going to produce revenue streams in all directions... Console sales, hardware licensing, software licensing, duplication housing, retail products, PC devices, backup/writable media... and on and on and on.
Now that Sony is losing ground in the movie arena, data backup may be their best bet to avoid those departments catching an hatchet in the head... I suspect that's why we're hearing about the 100Gb discs.
And if Disney has in fact NOT voted on previous HD-DVD specs... this is a VERY important milestone... I can see Disney 3 years from now talking about how they've believed and worked on the HD-DVD spec since 2007.... and we'll all remember how Disney scolded us for supporting HD-DVD... not that that will stop me from buying Cars or Rattatoulle on HD-DVD.
[Post edited by shawnwc on Nov 21, 2007]
Now that Sony is losing ground in the movie arena, data backup may be their best bet to avoid those departments catching an hatchet in the head... I suspect that's why we're hearing about the 100Gb discs.
And if Disney has in fact NOT voted on previous HD-DVD specs... this is a VERY important milestone... I can see Disney 3 years from now talking about how they've believed and worked on the HD-DVD spec since 2007.... and we'll all remember how Disney scolded us for supporting HD-DVD... not that that will stop me from buying Cars or Rattatoulle on HD-DVD.
[Post edited by shawnwc on Nov 21, 2007]
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
You guys kill me. Please show me where HDDVD has taken over. HDDVD said the same thing about the 50 gig BD disk, that it was not needed for movies and then lord behold here they come with the 51 that might not even work in current players. If it wasn't needed why develope it. The Transformers is proof that more storage is needed. I sure hope that they do play your triple layed disk cause it's going to be hell to pay if they don't from HDDVD owners. That's why you get it right first and not rush out and buy something just cause it has a pretty picture.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
yeah...that right! You get it right first....or just release firmware updates until you do! Erm...unless they make your first player obsolete to playing that content and you need to buy another, more current one.
wait....what was Blu-Ray doing right?
wait....what was Blu-Ray doing right?
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
"The Transformers is proof that more storage is needed." --Tony
A reminder that the Blu-ray editions of all three "Pirates of the Caribbean" movies use two-disc sets.
John
A reminder that the Blu-ray editions of all three "Pirates of the Caribbean" movies use two-disc sets.
John
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Member since:
August 2007
August 2007
Rush to market??? 1.1 ring a bell???
Fact is most HD movies with audio can fit on 15Gb-20Gb. My point was that prior to this week, lots and lots of BR fanbois were raving about the space difference, and how THAT made all the difference between BR & HD-DVD... and now that HD-DVD will do 51Gb, I'm hearing about how BR will do 100Gb.
Wah wah wah. Matters nothing at all. I took extras on a second DVD for what - 10 years??? Barely ever popped one in. What's important? Let's check
1920x1080 resolution & VC1 support
5.1, DTS & TrueHD for those that can
Ethernet Port (for updates & web content)
Dual Tuners
Price
Movie selection too, but that can all change without effecting early adopters (ie, if HD-DVD wins Disney can make HD-DVD movies and they'll work on my player).
Telling me now that choosing HD-DVD is a bad idea because BR is developing a 100Gb disc is silly. I've spoken with my wallet, and will continue to. The more I can get, the more I will speak.
Fact is most HD movies with audio can fit on 15Gb-20Gb. My point was that prior to this week, lots and lots of BR fanbois were raving about the space difference, and how THAT made all the difference between BR & HD-DVD... and now that HD-DVD will do 51Gb, I'm hearing about how BR will do 100Gb.
Wah wah wah. Matters nothing at all. I took extras on a second DVD for what - 10 years??? Barely ever popped one in. What's important? Let's check
1920x1080 resolution & VC1 support
5.1, DTS & TrueHD for those that can
Ethernet Port (for updates & web content)
Dual Tuners
Price
Movie selection too, but that can all change without effecting early adopters (ie, if HD-DVD wins Disney can make HD-DVD movies and they'll work on my player).
Telling me now that choosing HD-DVD is a bad idea because BR is developing a 100Gb disc is silly. I've spoken with my wallet, and will continue to. The more I can get, the more I will speak.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
The firmware upgrades do a LOT more than people are apparently aware of (I know this from speaking to the techs about it). Accessing a 3rd layer is a matter of where to focus the laser within the multiple layers of the DVD (HD DVD, in this case). A "4th" layer is highly unlikely, given the restrictions of the minimum depth requirements for the substrates, or the problems that might be created by making a disc a slight bit thicker. However, I wouldn't put it past the HD DVD consortium to explore that possibility down the road. I would think that all of the HD DVD players - even the XBOX 360 HD DVD drive - can be upgraded to play a 3-layered HD DVD. If not... I would hope that some serious rebate offers would be available to anyone who owns a machine that can't be upgraded!
Let's hope that if Disney "finally" decides to release their library on HD DVD... that their first "NEW" HD transfer is a fully-remastered version of "The Rocketeer." That movie is not even enhanced/anamorphic on regular DVD! They also better dip into their pockets and get Billy Campbell, Jennifer Connelly - and possibly Timothy Dalton, into the studio for a running commentary track for the remastered version. When we shell out our hard-earned dollars for a movie on HD DVD... we expect to get what we paid for (and I'll gladly pay 35-40 dollars for The Rocketeer on HD DVD - if they deliver the above, plus all the usual extras we come to expect)!
Let's hope that if Disney "finally" decides to release their library on HD DVD... that their first "NEW" HD transfer is a fully-remastered version of "The Rocketeer." That movie is not even enhanced/anamorphic on regular DVD! They also better dip into their pockets and get Billy Campbell, Jennifer Connelly - and possibly Timothy Dalton, into the studio for a running commentary track for the remastered version. When we shell out our hard-earned dollars for a movie on HD DVD... we expect to get what we paid for (and I'll gladly pay 35-40 dollars for The Rocketeer on HD DVD - if they deliver the above, plus all the usual extras we come to expect)!
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006
Quote:
that their first "NEW" HD transfer is a fully-remastered version of "The Rocketeer." That movie is not even enhanced/anamorphic on regular DVD!
Yeah, it plays full matted. I'm with you, I LOVE that movie.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Member since:
October 2007
October 2007
It is rumor that at steering committee meeting, someone tickled Disney CEO Robert Iger as a reflection, he raised his hand. Disney's CEO reaffirms commitment to Blu-ray.