Monday, January 14, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
August 2007
Anyone going to see Cloverfield on opening day? I don't know why but I can't wait see this movie.
Monday, January 14, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
I don't have the slightest interest in this movie.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
January 2006
January 2006
Going on Saturday morning. Can't wait, partly because of the Star Trek teaser attached at the beginning. 
Jason
Jason
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
December 2003
December 2003
I've got pre-view tickets to Cloverfield for tonight. If I remember, I'll take some notes and write a small review on it tomorrow. Don't worry, I won't spoil it. )
- Josh
[Post edited by Nachtkriechen on Jan 15, 2008]
- Josh
[Post edited by Nachtkriechen on Jan 15, 2008]
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
I can't wait! Every time I see a preview for the movie, I almost pee my pant!
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
December 2003
December 2003
Do I detect a "weeee" bit of sarchasm, Tim?
I don't blame you, I'm a little aprehensive myself. I am curious and suspicious as to why they've kept the monster in this movie so hush-hush to this point. Usually, if they don't release it early enough for critics to review it, it tends to be a horrible flick.
It seems to me when the initial trailer came out, months ago, for this movie, it was labeled "Bad Robot", not "Cloverfield". Does that give away the monster? I don't know, but, I'm curious. I guess I'll see tonight.
- Josh
[Post edited by Nachtkriechen on Jan 15, 2008]
I don't blame you, I'm a little aprehensive myself. I am curious and suspicious as to why they've kept the monster in this movie so hush-hush to this point. Usually, if they don't release it early enough for critics to review it, it tends to be a horrible flick.
It seems to me when the initial trailer came out, months ago, for this movie, it was labeled "Bad Robot", not "Cloverfield". Does that give away the monster? I don't know, but, I'm curious. I guess I'll see tonight.
- Josh
[Post edited by Nachtkriechen on Jan 15, 2008]
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
January 2006
January 2006
Quote:
Usually, if they don't release it early enough for critics to review it, it tends to be a horrible flick.
They are screening for critics. I've had two invites to the movie in the past week from the agency I work with, but they are over an hour away.
Quote:
It seems to me when the initial trailer came out, months ago, for this movie, it was labeled "Bad Robot", not "Cloverfield". Does that give away the monster? I don't know, but, I'm curious. I guess I'll see tonight.
"Bad Robot" is producer JJ Abrams production company. Nothing more and nothing less. The same name is on the end of LOST and was on Alias when it aired.
Jason
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
July 2006
This movie looks like Godzilla 2.0 but I wanna see it. Hey it's a Paramount movie! Sweet
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
December 2003
December 2003
If they're screening for critics, that's a good sign.
I guess I wasn't paying close enough attention when I first saw the trailer for this movie. But, it will be very interesting to see how I feel after the movie tonight.
- Josh
I guess I wasn't paying close enough attention when I first saw the trailer for this movie. But, it will be very interesting to see how I feel after the movie tonight.
- Josh
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Quote:
I don't blame you, I'm a little aprehensive myself. I am curious and suspicious as to why they've kept the monster in this movie so hush-hush to this point. Usually, if they don't release it early enough for critics to review it, it tends to be a horrible flick.
It's just Godzilla 2 and nothing more. The previews do look inviting, though.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
December 2003
December 2003
What I'd like to know is, why are monsters always attacking New York? Shouldn't they be attacking France?
- Josh
- Josh
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
What I can't understand is why it always has to be a big major city? Why not a random attack on Phoenix -- something nobody would expect.
Speaking of which, I finally saw the movie "The Kingdom" and was very surprised to see 3/4 of the movie was shot 12-miles from my house. Most of the major scenes in the film were all shot on a movie set they built by William Field Air Park durning the summer of 2006. It is fun to see a movie filmmed in your local area -- kind of makes the film that much more fun.
Speaking of which, I finally saw the movie "The Kingdom" and was very surprised to see 3/4 of the movie was shot 12-miles from my house. Most of the major scenes in the film were all shot on a movie set they built by William Field Air Park durning the summer of 2006. It is fun to see a movie filmmed in your local area -- kind of makes the film that much more fun.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
January 2006
January 2006
Quote:
Why not a random attack on Phoenix -- something nobody would expect.
Maybe cuz no one would care?
Look at Aliens vs. Predator. The entire movie happens in backwoods state and it turned into crap. Now have those same creatures in New York. Instantly more engrossing.
Jason
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
July 2006
Phoenix has some great scenery
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
It's more like this:

5th Largest in the US and still growing. Plus we also have SMOG!!!!

5th Largest in the US and still growing. Plus we also have SMOG!!!!
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Quote:
Look at Aliens vs. Predator. The entire movie happens in backwoods state and it turned into crap. Now have those same creatures in New York. Instantly more engrossing.
How so? It depends how you look at it. Anytime I see something devestating that focuses around New York, I think 'been there, done that!' I really don't see how it makes it more "Instantly engrossing".
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
January 2006
January 2006
Quote:
How so? It depends how you look at it. Anytime I see something devestating that focuses around New York, I think 'been there, done that!' I really don't see how it makes it more "Instantly engrossing".
Somehow I knew you would ask that.
See, if something happens in the middle of nowhere, the casualties are limited. If it happens in a big city, there can be bigger numbers of people dying. (Which is, after all, the idea of these types of movies.) For instance, if the plan is to nuke the city, doing away with the monster, there is theoretically more ethical debate about nuking NY or LA or Houston than small dumpy Colorado town.
Seeing a creature run around between buildings is more involving than having it obscured in darkness in a sewer. To me, anyway.
Jason
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
July 2006
Or like the Hulk running around in some desert jumping off mountains.
Tim I'm teasin you about Phoenix
[Post edited by Falcon01 on Jan 15, 2008]
Tim I'm teasin you about Phoenix
[Post edited by Falcon01 on Jan 15, 2008]
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
December 2003
December 2003
I think Tim's cactus is giving us the finger.
The whole "critters in the city" has already been done. Remember Predator 2? That was done in LA, and yes it was very interesting, and a drastically different take from the Jungles in the first Predator. Now if they were to have done AVP2 in the city again, that's all it would have been... a remake of Predator 2. You have to think context. Its only scary or interesting once. Wide open spaces is one thing that the Aliens/Predator series had not done yet.
Back on topic, if Cloverfield is just "Godzilla 2", as Tim says, I'll be pretty bored. I wasn't very impressed with the 1999 version. They're going to have to kick it up a bunch of notches to make it interesting for me. PJ's King Kong did a pretty good job of impressing me. There were a lot of things I didn't expect in Jackson's King Kong.
- Josh
The whole "critters in the city" has already been done. Remember Predator 2? That was done in LA, and yes it was very interesting, and a drastically different take from the Jungles in the first Predator. Now if they were to have done AVP2 in the city again, that's all it would have been... a remake of Predator 2. You have to think context. Its only scary or interesting once. Wide open spaces is one thing that the Aliens/Predator series had not done yet.
Back on topic, if Cloverfield is just "Godzilla 2", as Tim says, I'll be pretty bored. I wasn't very impressed with the 1999 version. They're going to have to kick it up a bunch of notches to make it interesting for me. PJ's King Kong did a pretty good job of impressing me. There were a lot of things I didn't expect in Jackson's King Kong.
- Josh
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
Quote:
What I can't understand is why it always has to be a big major city?
Tim you are so right, please give NY a break. First Godzilla now Godzilla with a cloaking device.