Thursday, February 28, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
Customers are getting soaked... To bad profile 2.0 didn't look like this...
Friday, February 29, 2008
Member since:
February 2008
February 2008
Quote:
All new Blu-ray models introduced since October of last year must be at least profile 1.1.
Gotta get rid of that old stock first though! Reatilers don't like stuff just sitting in the warehouses taking up space.
So you might have the barely functional 1.0 players sitting on the shelf for a paltry $200 come November. But the 1.1 and 2.0/BD Live players will likely be sitting pretty at $400+
[Post edited by spoonard on Feb 29, 2008]
Friday, February 29, 2008
Member since:
October 2007
October 2007
FYI, if you haven't notices, it says 'widely expected'...which only means we get our high hopes of a cheap player, and nothing happens...
Friday, February 29, 2008
Member since:
September 2007
September 2007
random reaggie...
but i do like that blu profile model.
does she upconvert?
but i do like that blu profile model.
does she upconvert?
Monday, March 3, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
Quote:
You're probably right Kuco but you shouldn't have to pay $350 for a fully functional bluray player. Is the hardware REALLY that expensive to make?
This was part of the problem which Toshiba created. Yes, they have to be that expensive, as would have been Toshiba's players had Toshiba not chosen to subsidize them. Unfortunately, to buy market share, they dropped their prices to a point where only subsidized players could compete with them. Since no other hardware manufacturer would subsidize players, Toshiba was left as the only player.
I am fairly confident that one important reason Toshiba has chosen not to enter the Blu-ray market is that their natural customer base (previous HD DVD customers) will not purchase players at unsubsidized prices and would likely be angry were Toshiba not to launch with a dual format player that would be even more expensive (certainly at least $200 more than a standalone Blu-ray player).
/carmi
Monday, March 3, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
Quote:
All new Blu-ray models introduced since October of last year must be at least profile 1.1.
Why let facts get in the way of a perfectly good rant?
/carmi
Monday, March 3, 2008
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
Quote:
Quote:
All new Blu-ray models introduced since October of last year must be at least profile 1.1.
Why let facts get in the way of a perfectly good rant?
/carmi
Here's a fact...the Samsung UP-5000 HD DVD/Blu combo deck is NOT profile 1.1 and it was released in December. Supposedly the unit will be upgraded to 1.1 via a firmware update, just like almost every other missing feature on the unit.
[Post edited by Bosshog7 on Mar 3, 2008]
Monday, March 3, 2008
Member since:
November 2007
November 2007
Until prices come down its hard to buy Disney movies on Blu ray because
my kids have SD dvd in their room and while I would love to buy them a cheap 1.0 Blue player
I am not going to pay more then 200 bucks for something a two and a four year old will likely end up destroying.
So for now I will buy all but the Pixar movies on SD.
And I know I am not the only parent in this boat.
Blu needs to be more realistic about prices or risk forever becoming just a nitch market as it is now,
[Post edited by xavier311 on Mar 3, 2008]
my kids have SD dvd in their room and while I would love to buy them a cheap 1.0 Blue player
I am not going to pay more then 200 bucks for something a two and a four year old will likely end up destroying.
So for now I will buy all but the Pixar movies on SD.
And I know I am not the only parent in this boat.
Blu needs to be more realistic about prices or risk forever becoming just a nitch market as it is now,
[Post edited by xavier311 on Mar 3, 2008]