Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
hey... no Blu ray? WHAT!?
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
come on, for what I heard that movie wasn't worth it, so i don't think paramount wants to waste money producing BD disks of their flop.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
Dude, this is far from a flop! They grossed $79,351,605 and their budget was 30,000,000... that is FAR from a flop.
Not to mention I would totally buy it on Blu-Ray. It's worth to put on BD Discs.
[Post edited by Mike37 on Mar 18, 2008]
Not to mention I would totally buy it on Blu-Ray. It's worth to put on BD Discs.
[Post edited by Mike37 on Mar 18, 2008]
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
February 2008
February 2008
You would want to watch a film that has been run through filters to look as though it's from an SD handy cam in HD? So in effect you would be watching SD in HD. That's rather self defeating I would think.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
Well when I saw it I thought it looked great.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Yeah, much like buying the "Grindhouse" movies! Gee, let's watch movies in HD that were filmed through filters of shit.
And no, I wouldn't say Cloverfield was a flop, either. Even film critics responded well to it as RT gives it a 77% rating. So yeah, not sure what you're hearing wii, but you might want to research a little first before you make a "flop" claim.
And no, I wouldn't say Cloverfield was a flop, either. Even film critics responded well to it as RT gives it a 77% rating. So yeah, not sure what you're hearing wii, but you might want to research a little first before you make a "flop" claim.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
Anyone who has seen it has to admit that it isn't nearly as heavily filtered as Grindhouse was. Grindhouse was just over the top compared to this.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
True, but the idea between all fims is they were made to have the PQ look cheap.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
I guess, I really don't remember it looking all that bad.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Quote:
I guess, I really don't remember it looking all that bad.
I agree "Cloverfield" isn't as bad as the "Grindhouse" movies in PQ. I get that each film has an intended, astistic approach ("Grindhouse" looks like old 70s films, "Cloverfield" looks like reality TV). All I'm saying is the overall PQ in these films is crap and not all polished like a cheesy blockbuster, such as "Tranformers".
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
September 2007
September 2007
Transofrmers was far from a cheesy blockbuster.
lol.
)
lol.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
you guys seem to forget that fox released "28 days later" on blu-ray even though the movie was shot in...SD VIDEO. LOL.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
I didn't get to see Cloverfield even though I wanted to. It only lasted a week where I am, plus the bad comments I heard from people and media, I heard it was a flop. Now to me watching this movie with the jumpy "camcorder" effect in HD would be like watching The Blairwitch Project in HD. Is just not worth it.
Making slightly over $79 million for a $30 million is not a "big success" in Hollywood terms. For Hollywood it would have been a big success to at least make $120 million dollars for a $30 million budget. To consider this $79 mill. box office movie a big success money wise, cloverfield should have had a single-digit millions dollar budget.
Youhave to admit the only reason Cloverfield was a box office "success" (debatable) was because they used unknown actors to keep the budget low. If the producers had used known actors Cloverfield (at $79 million) would have been an undisputable flop.
[Post edited by wii-lite on Mar 18, 2008]
Making slightly over $79 million for a $30 million is not a "big success" in Hollywood terms. For Hollywood it would have been a big success to at least make $120 million dollars for a $30 million budget. To consider this $79 mill. box office movie a big success money wise, cloverfield should have had a single-digit millions dollar budget.
Youhave to admit the only reason Cloverfield was a box office "success" (debatable) was because they used unknown actors to keep the budget low. If the producers had used known actors Cloverfield (at $79 million) would have been an undisputable flop.
[Post edited by wii-lite on Mar 18, 2008]
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Member since:
December 2007
December 2007
They didnt use unknown actors b/c they were cheap. The movie was meant to feel real, like you are watching a home video of someone in the incident. JJ didnt want you to say, I hope Shia Labouef can get away from that monster. It was an enjoyable movie they had to have spent much more on marketing, which was genius.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Quote:
I didn't get to see Cloverfield even though I wanted to. It only lasted a week where I am, plus the bad comments I heard from people and media, I heard it was a flop.
If you consider the movie a flop based on the opinion of a few people and the media . . .
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloverfield/
Apparently the majority have a different opinion. 79-million may not seem like a lot in Hollywood terms, but there is still money to be made off of the DVD sales, therefore that number is obviously going to increase. In the end, for a low budget film, they will have done pretty fair -- maybe not great, but still worthy enough to not be considered a flop by any means.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
well we all know Paramount arent doing anymore HD DVD releases (which came into effect at the start of March) & from what I've heard they wont start putting out titles on Blu Ray until the summer, so we'll have 4-5 months of SD only releases from Paramount. I'd expect Cloverfield on Blu Ray once they start releasing Blu Ray titles, so probably August. Expect the same for There Will Be Blood
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006
Don't forget that the "79 million" is just for ONE country - the USA. Movies make hundreds of millions more when combining the box office receipts from ALL the countries the movie was exhibited in. Didn't Disney reveal that the first 2 Pirates movies alone brought in over 1 BILLION in worldwide combined box office receipts. And sometimes a movie that does so-so box office in North America might end up being a big hit in other countries, with a long time playing in theaters. (I remember that the 3rd Rambo movie did modest box office here, but was a MAJOR SMASH overseas, especially in Middle Eastern countries - maybe because of the Afghanistan setting).
-JIMI (the Voodoo Child)
-JIMI (the Voodoo Child)
Monday, April 28, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006


Well... Eddie's got his CLOVERFIELD Review posted - (not a very good flick) - so take a moment to read it. This will be a rental for me soon, and just hope I don't get sick viewing it (on my plasma), as some have indicated is possible because of the constant and severe jerky images.










-JIMI LOVE (the Voodoo Child)
[Post edited by Love Hendrix! on Apr 28, 2008]
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006

Nice! - I'm glad I haven't rented the SD-DVD yet, as we heard yesterday of Paramount's forthcoming Blu-ray release schedule, and that CLOVERFIELD will be released in early June. According to various websites' info, here are some details -
As hoped by many, this Blu-ray release will include full 1080p video as well as Dolby TrueHD audio. Additionally, this release features an exclusive Blu-ray-only HD option in the so-called "Special Investigation Mode" (Picture in Graphics track). Sounding much like a trivia track, this feature provides the viewer with tidbits of information on the film as the story unfolds.
> BD-50 Dual-Layer Disc
(video codec unknown at this time)
> 1.78:1 aspect ratio (1080p/24)
> English Dolby TrueHD 5.1 Surround
> English Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround
> English SDH (subtitles)
* Special Investigation Mode (Blu-ray exclusive)
* Commentary by Director Matt Reeves
* Document 01.18.08: The Making of Cloverfield featurette
* Cloverfield Visual Effects featurette
* I Saw It! It's Alive! It's Huge! featurette
* Clover Fun featurette
* 4 Additional Scenes
* 2 Alternate Endings w/optional commentary
* 14 Easter Eggs
Plot Synopsis: Five young New Yorkers throw their friend a going-away party the night that a monster the size of a skyscraper descends upon the city. Told from the point of view of their video camera, the film is a document of their attempt to survive the most surreal, horrifying event of their lives.

-Looking forward to the Blu-ray rental on this!
_____________
-JIMI McLovin (the Voodoo Child)
[Post edited by Love Hendrix! on Apr 30, 2008]
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
This movie sucks. The documentary aspect just threw me off. I liked the "look" of the film, but filming your best friend right after his brother got wasted (along with other instances) just threw me off. It was as if I was watching a movie with the cameraman giving vocal instructions or something... save your money Hendrix.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006
bladerunner1 said -
Well, as I said above, it will be a RENTAL for me, and a FREE rental at that... a benefit of Blockbuster's TOTAL ACCESS online membership, which allows local in-store returns (of your online rentals), swapped with a FREE rental to take home. And my local Blockbuster store is now carrying about 50 Blu-ray movies (so far).
_____________
-JIMI McLovin (the Voodoo Child)
Quote:
"save your money Hendrix."
Well, as I said above, it will be a RENTAL for me, and a FREE rental at that... a benefit of Blockbuster's TOTAL ACCESS online membership, which allows local in-store returns (of your online rentals), swapped with a FREE rental to take home. And my local Blockbuster store is now carrying about 50 Blu-ray movies (so far).
_____________
-JIMI McLovin (the Voodoo Child)
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
Why would you want this movie in Blu the video quality sucks from there camcorder usage in the movie ? And with the way they filmed it who would watch it more then once ! This movie could have been so much better...
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Given that the whole point of this movie is that it was supposed to have been shot using a typical, consumer-grade camcorder, the widescreen, high-definition picture and Dolby TrueHD 5.1 sound seem more than a bit...misplaced?
John
John
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Brooooooo-raaaaaayyyy