Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006
My posts are similar to most others - sometimes a quick note, other times a thorough amount of info, which I truly hope is beneficial (not meant to be 'showing off', trust me). Sure, some of us just skim thru long posts, but on subjects we are -really- interested in, I'm certain every word of a long post is read. Just like reading the movie reviews here at DVDTOWN, as none of them are 'short' (except some of the theatrical reviews).
With that in mind, here's a brief message for Tim (and others) to check out. I just noticed a link from engadgetHD to a 4/14/08 Cnet review of Samsung's latest plasma HDTV, in 1080p. This time Samsung has produced an excellent set at a good price, and the TV does 'pass' the crucial 1080i deinterlacing tests of film-based signals (like Pioneer does). So I'm thinking this would be a nice set for Tim to check out. And every 'box' (last part of the review) is marked GOOD - that's rare from any manufacturer.
Cnet said the color accuracy is excellent, great connectivity, design, although the black levels and anti-reflective screen aren't the equal of either Pioneer or Panasonic. Still, I recommend Tim that you put this set on your 'check it out' short list when visiting your local dealers.
One person commented on engadgetHD - "I own the Samsung PN50A550 and it is a fantastic set. The colors are vibrant and beautiful and it is also pretty bright for a plasma. The dynamic contrast ratio is very very bright, and I don't use it that often. It is also a very sexy looking set overall, the black bezel is quite sleek."
-JIMI (the Voodoo Child)
With that in mind, here's a brief message for Tim (and others) to check out. I just noticed a link from engadgetHD to a 4/14/08 Cnet review of Samsung's latest plasma HDTV, in 1080p. This time Samsung has produced an excellent set at a good price, and the TV does 'pass' the crucial 1080i deinterlacing tests of film-based signals (like Pioneer does). So I'm thinking this would be a nice set for Tim to check out. And every 'box' (last part of the review) is marked GOOD - that's rare from any manufacturer.
Cnet said the color accuracy is excellent, great connectivity, design, although the black levels and anti-reflective screen aren't the equal of either Pioneer or Panasonic. Still, I recommend Tim that you put this set on your 'check it out' short list when visiting your local dealers.
One person commented on engadgetHD - "I own the Samsung PN50A550 and it is a fantastic set. The colors are vibrant and beautiful and it is also pretty bright for a plasma. The dynamic contrast ratio is very very bright, and I don't use it that often. It is also a very sexy looking set overall, the black bezel is quite sleek."
-JIMI (the Voodoo Child)
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
August 2007
HD Projector! plain and simple! You said your room is 20 x 30 that is plenty of room for a projector. Were talking and image 6' to 10' wide or more!
http://www.projectorpeople.com/projectors/projdtls.asp?itemid=22991&itmname=HD80
Why say I have 42" diagonal when you can say I have 10' wide?
[Post edited by Ironbull on Apr 16, 2008]
http://www.projectorpeople.com/projectors/projdtls.asp?itemid=22991&itmname=HD80
Why say I have 42" diagonal when you can say I have 10' wide?
[Post edited by Ironbull on Apr 16, 2008]
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
August 2007
Opps double post!
[Post edited by Ironbull on Apr 16, 2008]
[Post edited by Ironbull on Apr 16, 2008]
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Member since:
June 2006
June 2006



I agree with Ironbull, should you decide on a front-projection system. The large image (as Skyhawk can attest) is truly remarkable from a comfortable distance (so as not to harm your eyes). Most front projection units these days offer excellent processing and image quality (whether it's a DLP unit, LCOS, etc), both in 1080p and 720p.
The only 'downside' to f-p units, is again, the need for regular bulb replacement after a certain number of hours (usually between 2000 to 6000 hours depending on the unit). And the bulbs are NOT cheap, usually $250 and higher. So, it's an option should you not decide on a conventional HDTV 'set' (flat panel).













-JIMI (the Voodoo Child)
[Post edited by Love Hendrix! on Apr 16, 2008]
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
Not a Sony Bravia
Infocus, Panasonic, or Mits!!!
I have a Panasonic 1000! It rocks!
I have a Panasonic 1000! It rocks!
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
Front projectors+Ambient lite=disaster. These are great for basements however, I also agree with the boys/girls in that 42 inches will not treat you right Tim. Way too small. That's what pisses me off about all these so called AV mags, They are always pushing dinky little sets! You throw a 235.1 image on a 42 inch set,you miles well be at grandmas. These are great for bedrooms though. In the high definition age,you can sit much closer to the set. I sit aprox. 10-12 feet from the 56incher and it is pure bliss. I am not trying to brag here Tim,I didnt invent the damn set,but I can say that it was invented with high def. in mind. And as I sit in front of it now, I just want to grab you by the ear and say "Dude...1,700 dollars". And then we are off to C.C. to get yours....And any other goodies you might want to pick up with the "change" you have left over.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
bladerunner,
If you have a 56" screen and sit ten to twelve feet from it, that might be a bit too distant. Ideally, you might try sitting about nine feet away. At least for HD content. (See below)
Tim,
If you have the room to sit far enough away from a 72" screen, say ten - twelve feet, do it. Be aware, however, that you probably won't be watching only high-definition content, and unless the standard-def content is very, very good, sitting too close to a really big screen, even an HD one, can make SD material painful to watch.
Despite people's admonitions always to buy big, it depends on your room and your viewing distance. I sit about 5 1/2 feet from my screen in a very small room. My 34" screen is perfect for the occasion. If I get a 42" screen eventually (about the biggest the room will accommodate), I'll need to move the set back against the wall and try to get about 6 to 7 feet away to view it. That's the maximum distance I have to play with in my little room.
And about the Sony Bravias. The company makes a standard Bravia and an XBR line of Bravias. At 42", I've not seen a better picture than on the Bravia XBR. These sets are a little pricey, but to my eyes they look as close to a good CRT as I've seen in that size range.
John
If you have a 56" screen and sit ten to twelve feet from it, that might be a bit too distant. Ideally, you might try sitting about nine feet away. At least for HD content. (See below)
Tim,
If you have the room to sit far enough away from a 72" screen, say ten - twelve feet, do it. Be aware, however, that you probably won't be watching only high-definition content, and unless the standard-def content is very, very good, sitting too close to a really big screen, even an HD one, can make SD material painful to watch.
Despite people's admonitions always to buy big, it depends on your room and your viewing distance. I sit about 5 1/2 feet from my screen in a very small room. My 34" screen is perfect for the occasion. If I get a 42" screen eventually (about the biggest the room will accommodate), I'll need to move the set back against the wall and try to get about 6 to 7 feet away to view it. That's the maximum distance I have to play with in my little room.
And about the Sony Bravias. The company makes a standard Bravia and an XBR line of Bravias. At 42", I've not seen a better picture than on the Bravia XBR. These sets are a little pricey, but to my eyes they look as close to a good CRT as I've seen in that size range.
John
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
I still say DLP LED for the money/size(the new models). Someone said the contrast is better on a plasma but Samsung are saying their new sets have 10,000:1 contrast ratio. Pretty much what everything else has now. I know there are expensive lcds that can have 15000 but will you really notice that difference or is it worth the money?
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
March 2008
Hey John,
I sit were the couch is. On the back wall. I have leaned in closer to the set and yeah,everything still looks great,and a little larger. But I have to make compromises with the wife.lol I had a 61 inch rear projection in my room before this one and it was too large(in every sense of the word). The bravia you are speaking of is a fantastic set. It was one I clearly had my eye on when I purchased the DLP roughly a year ago. It was too small for my needs and I just couldnt pull the trigger to pay that much for a 42 inch screen.(although it was beautiful,yummy) I dont know were Tim is planning on putting his set,or how far away he plans to sit from it. I was just throwing in my 2 cents. I'm a "best bang for your buck" person.( I wanted Lexicon.I got Sunfire.)
I sit were the couch is. On the back wall. I have leaned in closer to the set and yeah,everything still looks great,and a little larger. But I have to make compromises with the wife.lol I had a 61 inch rear projection in my room before this one and it was too large(in every sense of the word). The bravia you are speaking of is a fantastic set. It was one I clearly had my eye on when I purchased the DLP roughly a year ago. It was too small for my needs and I just couldnt pull the trigger to pay that much for a 42 inch screen.(although it was beautiful,yummy) I dont know were Tim is planning on putting his set,or how far away he plans to sit from it. I was just throwing in my 2 cents. I'm a "best bang for your buck" person.( I wanted Lexicon.I got Sunfire.)
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
March 2002
Quote:
..I'm buying a small (600 sq ft) apartment in Vancouver and the TV is too big for the small living room
You mean Vancouver B.C., right? I ask because I'm from Vancouver Washington, which always gets confused with Vancouver BC. Nevertheless, I've been living in Phoenix for the past 13-years -- I'm sure that would be a costly delivery. lol