Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Member since:
January 2008
January 2008
When I finish a game's single player missions I want to enjoy a lag free eternity of online gaming with real people. PS3 cannot come close to the online network gaming of xbox live. Yeah, you have to pay a cheap yearly membership to play 360 online but its worth every penny. Thats the biggest reason why I think someone should pick a 360 over PS3(when Microsoft said online gaming is the consoles future people laughed, boy were they wrong to scoff). Besides that, on "same game titles" I remember gamespot.com comparing and saying that most games came out looking better on the xbox. Finaly, I havn't seen a game on the PS3 yet that I would want to buy. All the good ones are available on the 360 or are only on the 360.
Microsoft may be an evil, small company destroyer but they are the lesser of two evils.
[Post edited by wolvinator on May 6, 2008]
Microsoft may be an evil, small company destroyer but they are the lesser of two evils.
[Post edited by wolvinator on May 6, 2008]
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Member since:
February 2008
February 2008
The only things that PS3 has that is better are HDD standard and More disc space. That BD space hasn't been put to good use now, and the disc drive is slow. 360 is a superior console, they just needed to buy smaller CPU and GPU chips from the start and they should have not made the core/arcade consoles. Without HDD standard, devs can't make some games cache on 360 so some games have texture pop up.