Fool's Gold = Fool's Movie

OK, suffered the "Bucket List" last week, and now this one. This one was even crappier - I mean much worse. I don't remember the mountains and cliffs in freakin' Key West last time we were there 3 years ago... did some earth quake change the landscape completely?

It's not that they couldn't film on location, but that they couldn't even pick a location that resembled the island, let alone then believed that no one would see the movie except from a small village from a developing country and therefor would not notice. Oh wait, I'm from a small village in a developing country and I noticed! Hmmmm...

This kind of fluff isn't entertaining at all, and to think our rental store had this at #1 rental this Tuesday? WTF? I don't mind Hollywood recycling EVERYTHING from past movies - but do they have to execute all the (now) cliched ideas worse than ever done before? Is it like some sort of freakin' contest?

---

[Post edited by Skyhawk on Jun 17, 2008]

Fool's Gold=Kate Hudson in Bikini=Good enough for me!!!

Watch Tarzan, you get to see Bo Derek without a bikini. Plus she's infinitely more beautiful...at least IMO.

Fool's Gold = Kate Hudson fully dressed throughout movie = bad.
Fool's Gold = McConaughey bare chested throughout movie = bad.

Honestly, this movie had nothing redeeming going for it.

Anymore questions?

Fool's Gold=Kate Hudson in bikini, does not=fully clothed

...besides....JJ79 probably doesn't mind Mathew McStinky bear chested lol.
With all that said..you're right it was kind of a brutal movie....but did i mention that Kate Hudson looked hot???

---

[Post edited by Bosshog7 on Jun 18, 2008]

Quote:
Fool's Gold=Kate Hudson in bikini, does not=fully clothed

She was in as many scenes in a bikini as McConaughey was in wearing a shirt. One 10 second scene?

I think there were way more "hot shots" of Alexis Dziena, while Hudson remained fully covered up in most of this film.

---

[Post edited by Skyhawk on Jun 18, 2008]

Bosshog if you want to see Kate Hudson in a bikini, then go to lazygirls.info and search her up.

Watching Fools Gold is not worth it.

I really enjoyed the romantic comedy hidden treasure concept, when it was called "Romancing the Stone"

Hey, I liked the Bucket List...thought it was a great movie

Fool's Gold...I think I'll wait for it to hit the movie channels )

Suddenly, Fools Gold doesn't seem so bad.

We tried watching a much worse movie than Fools Gold last night... called "Witless Protection". After 20 minutes, we stopped the movie and I sealed it up in the Zip return envelope, and watched "Rent" instead.

And I watched "Fool's Gold" after just having suffered through "10,000 BC." I guess it's all relative. "Fool's Gold" was pretty empty-headed, but next to something really, really boring like "BC," it looks like an Oscar contender.

Then there were "Funny Games," "The Eye," "The Ruins," and "Drillbit Taylor" that I recently watched. "Fool's Gold" is looking better and better all the time.

John

Ouch John, darn I'm sorry to hear 10,000 BC. is so bad. I'll still give it a rent though, but from my zip account where it will be cheaper and make up my own mind.

But you have to realize that we rarely never cut short watching a movie because it's bad. Normally, we suffer to the end and give it a fighting chance to redeem itself somewhere. Not so with that "Witless Protection" movie. It was just too much, and I knew where it was going, how it would end, etc. from the 20 or so minutes we did watch. Perhaps culturally I didn't get the humor, but I do with similar movies that are much more original. So I blame the movie. 1 out of 10 stars.