News Comments :: News Comments

Page 2 of 7
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
October 2007
I'm with Tim on X2. The early Nightcrawler scene at the White House was amazing, but after that the whole movie went downhill.

But for Tony Stark, he's supposed to be an a-hole sometimes. And sure, there wasn't any romance, but there was still some tension between him and Paltrow. Maybe it will develop further in the sequel.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
January 2006
Tim,

X2 is the first comic book movie that made a social parallel-the plight of mutants (coming out, etc.) and orientation. It gets major points for even trying, let alone pulling it off reasonably well. The cornball elements you mention I ascribe to keeping as close as possible to the comic origins. Police are notoriously inept there, too!

Falcon,

I only saw the regular version, not IMAX. I'm weary of the IMAX experience for a 152 minute opus, though. It would probably just give me a massive headache from being so big and in my face!

Jason, nap time
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
March 2004
Quote:
I never said SM2 wasn't an excellent movie. Every time I watch it, I enjoy it. But as Eddie says, the CGI is bad. You're always aware what you're watching can't be real. Maguire is no Christian Bale and Spidey does not have a villain to match the Joker. Alfred Molina and Willem Defoe and Thomas Hayden Church are good actors. Ledger blows them out of the water.


My Spidey response was directed towards ReaggieP

I think its obvious that Spider-Man 2's whole was greater than the sum of its parts as you pointed out. While I completely agree that Ledger's performance as The Joker was better than any comic book movie villain seen to date, I do think its a bit unfair to make direct comparisons to others like Molina and Defoe.

The direction Nolan was taking the franchise, the role of The Joker (and the script penned for his character), and the breathing room Heath was given for interpretation was a once in a lifetime opportunity (which he completley seized). What I'm getting at is that Molina's Doctor Octopus could never aspire to be what Ledger's Joker was because of the character's foundation.

I completely agree with Tim on the character development in SM2. Parker & Octavian's transitions were some of the most natural and organic we've seen in the genre.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
September 2005
Without a doubt, "The Dark Knight" is a masterpiece when compared to even the best comic book hero adaptations. It's in a class all its own.

Eddie always the contrarian. You're predictable, I'll give you that much.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
October 2004
Quote:
Eddie always the contrarian. You're predictable, I'll give you that much.



Thinking the movie is merely very good instead of great makes you a contrarian now? Tough crowd.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
March 2008
Tim..Your a nerd.

Infact IMO your all nerds.
[Post edited by bladerunner1 on Jul 20, 2008]
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
What did you say Bladerunner?



Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
October 2004
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Member since:
March 2002
"Now pay attention to how I straddle the pole Robin -- this move drives the men crazy!"



Monday, July 21, 2008
Member since:
October 2003
Why so serious?



-Will
Page 2 of 7

You must be logged on My Town to reply to this topic.

Don't miss the latest news:

Advertisement: