Search Movie Database for

Audyssey Labs wants us to use 10-channel surround

Want to make a post? Log on with a free my town account.

This post refers to...

Falcon01

May 1, 2009 - CDT 12:24 PM
Falcon01
Member since:
July 2006
9.1? SERIOUSLY?? How many speakers do these people think we want to have in our house? lol.

In my opinion 7.2 (yes .2 for a second subwoofer, one on the left side, one on the right) is MORE THAN ENOUGH for people to have in their living room.

Movielover316

May 1, 2009 - CDT 12:57 PM
Movielover316
Member since:
September 2006
Eh this makes no difference unless the movie is encoded in 9.1 but I'm sure all the electronics companies will love to market receivers and speaker packages in 9.1. Even though 90% of the time you'll never use it to full capacity.

the_dvd_chef

May 1, 2009 - CDT 1:23 PM
the_dvd_chef
Member since:
December 2007
I hate having to upgrade my sound system to keep up. I am going to stick with 7.1 for now, and hold out until 22,109.14159 surround becomes affordable for the home market and there is sufficient titles to support it.

S_Coaster

May 1, 2009 - CDT 1:34 PM
S_Coaster
Member since:
May 2004
I'm guessing amplifiers with this feature will simply take the existing coded signal and re-distribute it to the additional channels.

Are they developing their own audio codec for discreet 9.1 or expecting Dolby and DTS to code?

I have to agree with most of the posters here, 7.1 (or 2) sounds more than enough to me. Even for a specialized home theater room. We now enjoy incredibly high-bitrate audio streams from blu-ray discs, identical to the theater tracks and even the bare minimum (5.1) is enough to impress and immerse.

This reminds me when "we were soldiers" came out, it had an extra "TOP" channel, literally mounted on the ceiling.

Positioning question: I always wondered why do we have to place home cinema speakers on ear-level while cinema venues have them at least half a meter above the listening position.

John J. Puccio

May 1, 2009 - CDT 1:52 PM
says... "It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide." --A.E. Neuman
John J. Puccio
Member since:
March 2002
Quote:
Positioning question: I always wondered why do we have to place home cinema speakers on ear-level while cinema venues have them at least half a meter above the listening position.
--S_Coaster

You don't. In fact, as you say, movie theaters position their side and rear speakers above the audience's ears. At the Dolby Labs Web site http://www.dolby.com/index.html, they provide system setups for 5.1 and 7.1 home sound, and in both cases the surround and rear speakers are higher than ear level. The front channels should be at ear level, but not the sides and back. Otherwise, we'd have helicopters flying through our heads instead of over them.

John

S_Coaster

May 1, 2009 - CDT 2:25 PM
S_Coaster
Member since:
May 2004
That's interesting. I've setup many home theater in-a-box system for friends, and the ones they come with rear speaker stands are always on ear level

It's funny how people always mention helicopters as an example for surround sound. I think it has to do with apocalypse now. It was the first 5.1 movie right?

(btw, mr. john, i was wondering if you had an email address, i want to ask you smt in private, i would basically want to ask your opinion on smt, thnx)
[Post edited by S_Coaster on May 1, 2009 - CDT 2:31 PM]

Falcon01

May 1, 2009 - CDT 2:30 PM
Falcon01
Member since:
July 2006
Quote:
Otherwise, we'd have helicopters flying through our heads instead of over them.


True and don't forget the cars in Fast and the Furious crushing our skulls.

John J. Puccio

May 1, 2009 - CDT 3:03 PM
says... "It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide." --A.E. Neuman
John J. Puccio
Member since:
March 2002
S_Coaster,

Check your Friends request list. I sent you a request.

And for the rest of you DVDTOWN members, remember, if you want to contact any of the staff, just put us in your "Friends" list (by making a one-time request of each of us first), and we'd be glad to communicate with you.

John
[Post edited by John J. Puccio on May 1, 2009 - CDT 3:52 PM]

ReaggieP

May 1, 2009 - CDT 7:42 PM
says... is thinking "Brick House"...
ReaggieP
Member since:
January 2008
I am currently using 7.2, with one extra subwoofer right now. I have one sub channel split handling two series of frequencies, and it works very well. If I had the option that my room was actually longer I guess I could fit in two more speakers. Unfortunately it is not a the 7 speakers works well. 7.3 does me just fine. But however I have a few clients that could benefit with 9.2, 9.3 and even 9.5.

Want to make a post? Log on with a free my town account.


New post

You must be logged on My Town to use the message board.

Get this site ad-free »