Grading Blu-ray on the eve of its third anniversary
Want to make a post? LOG ON » with your free my town account or SIGN UP NOW » (Takes less than 60 seconds)
This post refers to...
Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of 6
Want to make a post? LOG ON » with your free my town account or SIGN UP NOW » (Takes less than 60 seconds)
Search the entire site
Latest posts
3D TV is a Gimmick »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 7:42 PM
AVATAR confirmed for April 22nd on DVD and Blu-ray »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 7:40 PM
THE PACIFIC coming to Blu-ray and DVD later this year »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 6:42 PM
Hey DVDTOWN staff »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 4:25 PM
Get a Blu-ray player for just $79.99 »
Mar 16, 2010 - CDT 1:35 PM
Down-streaming: Netflix and the Roku Box »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 11:46 PM
New 'Shrek Forever After' Trailer »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 3:09 PM
Local Blockbuster Closing »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 12:42 PM
"OZ" the next Harry Potter!!! »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 9:27 AM
GOD OF WAR 3! »
Mar 15, 2010 - CDT 8:49 AM
New FORD Motors Ad from SNL »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 4:29 PM
Anyone Watching 'Green Zone' This Weekend? »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 10:56 AM
R.I.P. Corey Haim »
Mar 14, 2010 - CDT 10:32 AM
WAR OF THE WORLDS - Steven Spielberg's remake starring Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning coming to high-def Blu-ray (June 1) »
Mar 12, 2010 - CST 10:48 AM
Sony signs up all six major studios for HD movies on PlayStation Network »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:47 AM
Sony's Blu-ray players do 3D in 1080p even with HDMI 1.3 »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:43 AM
New TRON Trailer »
Mar 11, 2010 - CST 11:38 AM
Mr.Clooney at the Oscars »
Mar 10, 2010 - CST 1:44 PM
CONGRATS TO KATHRYN BIGELOW!!! »
Mar 9, 2010 - CST 11:40 PM
HD DVD at BEST Buy »
Mar 9, 2010 - CST 6:02 PM
RSS feed with latest message board posts »
Message Board Archive »

EmoHeadbanger924
December 2004
My links
View profile »View wish list »
antennahead
March 2009
My links
View profile »John
John J. Puccio
March 2002
My links
View profile »View collection »
And representing the defense, I would argue that the better one's home-theater setup, the more likely one will notice the improvements in true high-definition playback as opposed to simulated upscaling. I would say that it is only on inferior equipment that one would notice few or no improvements.
I have had the opportunity to compare Blu-ray and HD DVD discs with their standard-definition counterparts in hundreds of instances now, side-by-side, played in separate machines for almost instant analysis (using a Toshiba HD-A35 for upscaling the SDs), and in no case have I ever experienced a comparison where the high-definition disc wasn't significantly superior in picture and in sound.
Quote:I have an Oppo 983 and a pro-calibrated Pioneer Kuro, 50". The Oppo upscales with the ABT chip solution to a beautiful 1080P. At a seating distance of 8 to 10 feet, the slight improvement in picture quality of Blue does not justify the large price increase.
With this I can wholly agree. Since the recommended viewing distance for high definition is 1.5 to 1.75 times the diagonal size of one's screen, a person with a 50" set should be sitting between 75" and 87.5" away. If one is sitting at 8 to 10 feet, that would be 96" to 120" from the set and much too far away to notice the significant improvements I mentioned above.
John
[Post edited by John J. Puccio on May 16, 2009 - CDT 1:37 AM]
antennahead
March 2009
My links
View profile »[Post edited by antennahead on May 16, 2009 - CDT 1:39 AM]
John J. Puccio
March 2002
My links
View profile »View collection »
Please repost your reply. I accidentally deleted it when I went to reply to you. I'm sorry.
John
antennahead
March 2009
My links
View profile »I think it was something along the lines of Blue Ray being "substantially" better is a subjective comment, as to the percentage amount of better. As we've covered, I sit about 10 feet from the 50" Kuro. In my opinion, using the Oppo 983 and upscaling to 1080P, I would only say Blue Ray would yield about a 10% improvement in picture quality for me. I think people misunderstand my argument. Blue ray is DEFINITELY superior to DVD, with the improvements most noticed the larger the screen goes and or the closer one sits to the screen. People are amazed at the quality picture I get with my combination... easily equaling Directv HD "lite". The problem right now for me John, is in many cases I can get a movie I want for under $10, with many titles in my collection being purchased for $5 to $7.50. These are good movies, not bargin bin junk. Does most of the public get as good a DVD picture as my system does? I doubt it...... not saying that to brag, just that most won't spend the money on a player like the Opoo nor to calibrate a display. I think when this group buys Blue and plays it through their 42" monitor sitting 5 feet away they do get a better picture than a regular DVD on a $50 player. I am all about higher quality, and one day will probably add Blue ray to my collection, but right now, I think they are still priced too high, especially in this economy. BTW, thanks for the great reviews you do, I have been a fan for years, and have been reading the site for years as well. Glad to see you haven't abandoned SD DVD reviews also, like some sites!
John
[Post edited by antennahead on May 16, 2009 - CDT 3:12 AM]
ReaggieP
January 2008
My links
View profile »Revolution21X
April 2006
My links
View profile »View wish list »
Which is another thing (I think) that adds to people saying Blu-Ray is only marginally better than DVD. They see a bad transfer, which can look like a DVD quality image, and think that's how all Blu-Ray's look. Another thing I've noticed (I don't know how prominent this is) is that some HDTV's have a built in noise reduction filter. With mine I am able to turn it off, but other HDTV's you can't. So essentially you have a permanent filter that tries to take out the film grain (something I love. I can't think of another home format that allowed me to see the film grain like Blu-Ray does. ) but really it winds up flattening the image and blurring textures. Mostly skin textures. So even HDTV's can work against Blu-Ray making it look like a DVD.
I will admit that when I first got my Blu-Ray player I was worried I wouldn't notice a big difference after hearing people say they couldn't. Especially since I have limited funds and was hoping I didn't just wastes my money. Once I hooked it up I saw a huge improvement in picture quality. Then even more so once I tweaked all the visual settings. More or less turning off all the things that degraded the image from my HDTV.
Then I noticed the audio (Which is the main reason I wanted Blu-Ray) and I was dumbfounded and giddy with how it sounded. Now I'm so used to Blu-Ray audio that when I watched a DVD recently the sound just disappointed me. It was just too hollow sounding, especially the bass.
Which leads into a thought I had. Audiophiles complain about how bad MP3s sound because of their low bit-rate. So when you think of a 5.1 Dolby Digital bit-rate of 640 Kbps. That's for 6 speakers. So divide those two and you have 106.6 Kbps for each speaker...ya not perfect logic. It is amusing (if there is any truth to that logic) that 5.1 Dolby Digital has close to the same bit-rate as a 256 Kbps encoded Mp3 does. It would explain the hollow sound. But this is probably just bad logic.
As for the long load times and no player book-marking. I've adapted to that. It annoyed me at first, but being the human I am, I've adapted to it. I click the player on a few minutes before I'm ready to watch the film (if it's one of the studios with a bunch of previews or what have you). As for stopping in the middle of a film I don't have a work around. I just got used to having to go through the menu again. I try not to do it too much of course.
Haven't had any playback issues with my Panasonic. So I can't say much on that. I looked at a lot of reviews and opinions on players. So I knew to stay away from some Samsung models after hearing a bunch of bad playback stories involving them. While other brands took too long to load or couldn't handle the hi-def image very well.
I guess the one thing I know about Blu-Ray for sure is that it seems to be a mine field at the moment. A lot of things are working against the consumer to get a good picture. From the HDTV's to the players to the Blu-Ray transfers themselves.
Oh and as for price I average about 10 to 20 dollars for each Blu-Ray I buy. You just have to look for good deals/sales/promo codes. I shop online more than at the stores. Also patience is a plus. Waiting a bit after the film has come out for the price to drop helps.
I also like the scratch resistance of Blu-Rays. Which is nice if you rent from Netflix. I haven't seen a scratch on a Blu-Ray yet from shipping. Unlike the DVDs I've rented. A lot of older DVDs are horrible. As I'm sure everyone has a story on that front.
I'm not a professional in this area. It's just observations of mine from goofing around with my Blu-Ray player. I could be wrong on a lot of things.
[Post edited by Revolution21X on May 16, 2009 - CDT 1:48 PM]
mediagy
May 2009
My links
View profile »John J. Puccio
March 2002
My links
View profile »View collection »
"Batman Begins" in high definition is "bland"? Oh, dear.
I guess it's all in how you look at it. As I've said over and over, unless you have both a SD player and a BD player to play an SD and counterpart BD disc side by side for almost instant comparisions, you will never be able to see how much more improved even the poorest BD discs are over their SD counterparts.
On the other hand, in my experience almost everybody I know with a high-def television sits much too far away from it to appreciate any differences or improvements in BD (9-10 ft. from a 50" set is way, way too far away, almost twice the recommended distance for optimal HD viewing, but it's how most people I know do their television and movie watching). So be it. I only write up what I see here, and it's becoming ever more painful for me to watch movies in standard definition.
John