Search Movie Database for

Moonraker (DVD)

Special Edition

APPROX. 126 MINS. - PROD. YEAR: 1979 - MPA RATING: PG

skiten1

avatar
Member since:
March 2006
I'm surprised you liked this so much. Personally, I find it to be one of the worst Bond movies -- too broadly comical and silly for my taste. You are correct, though, that Roger Moore does nail the part here.

John J. Puccio

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
Coincidentally, I watched "Moonraker" again just the other night because I am going through the entire series again in chronological order. I far preferred Moore's next film, "For Your Eyes Only," with no gimmicks whatsoever, just pure adventure. You're right; for absolute silliness, "Moonraker" is the epitome of Moore's reign as Bond and why I thought he made almost the least-convincing Bond of all. But, yeah, I still liked the special effects and Jaws and all that great scenery.

John

Tim Raynor

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
The special effects and great scenery? You have to be kidding. You're being sarcastic, arn't you? "Moonraker" has to be one of the corniest Bond films ever! I saw it a few months ago, and if anything, I laughed at how appauling it was.

Thank goodness things get back to normal with "For Your Eyes Only", which I feel is Moore's best Bond film. However, things do go back to crap in "Octopussy" as Bond does a Tarzan yell in the jungle while swinging on a vine, and not to mention, some of the worst editing I've seen in a Bond movie. Then there's "A View to a Kill" which isn't worth the time to bitch about.

John J. Puccio

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
What can I say? I'm a sucker for scenery. I loved the scenes in Venice and South America, esp. You're right, though; it is hard to justify liking something so admittedly corny and silly as "Moonraker," but of all the Moore Bonds, there are only three I like: this one for its spectacle, "The Spy Who Loved Me," and "For Your Eyes Only." The rest are pretty weak stuff.

John

csjlong

avatar
Member since:
October 2004
I've always thought of "Moonraker" as the "Star Trek 5" of the franchise - the one everyone wants to pretend never happened. Loved it when I was a kid though.

posters5

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
"Die Another Day" was the pits as far as I'm concerned. Halle Berry is a TERRIBLE actress. Director Lee Tamahori was probably thinking more about what dresses to wear after hours rather than how to shoot a movie. Brosnan phoned in his performance. The only good thing about the movie was Rosamund Pike as Miranda Frost, but she was under-used.

csjlong

avatar
Member since:
October 2004
I thought "Die Another Day" was an adequate action flick, but not a good Bond film at all. The only thing "Bond-ish" about the movie was the character's name.

"The World is Not Enough" was a crushing disappointment simply because of the criminal waste of Robert Carlyle's talent - he had the potential to be the best Bond villain since Robert Shaw or at least since Robert Davi. Instead, they just made him a generic "crazy guy" and didn't even give him much screen time.

posters5

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
Chris,

The true villain in "The World Is Not Enough" is played by Sophie Marceau. Robert Carlyle was playing a pawn--he was *****-whipped, as they say.

Eddie

Tim Raynor

avatar
Member since:
March 2002
Well, I think Halle Berry can act when given the right role. Let's face it, 90% of Bond women acted poorly. Many of them gave a whole new trademark performance to wooden acting.

I, too, agree with Chris that "Moonraker" was a good film when I was a kid, but now . . . what the hell was I thinking? However, I really enjoyed "Die Another Day" and I guess it was the whole rogue agent thing that did it for me. Then again, I might have the same feelings I do about "Die Another Day" as I do about "Moonfaker" in ten-years.

Timmaaaaaay! ;)

You must be logged on to post comments

Please log on to My Town now!

Amazon.com (USA):

AXEL Music (Europe):

Get this site ad-free »