Playstation 3: Not the best Blu-ray player you can buy

Playstation 3: Not the best Blu-ray player you can buy.
What's New
By Henning Molbaek
FIRST ONLINE Mar 25, 2008

Tools:
Send to a friend »

A lot of debate is currently going on concerning the Blu-ray capabilities of the Playstation 3.

Many people (including myself) consider it one of the best Blu-ray options right now, perhaps only topped by the just-released Panasonic DMP BD30. The main reason for this has been that the PS3 is upgradeable to both Blu-ray profile 1.1 (Bonus View) and coming profile 2.0 (BD Live) and, of course, an attractive price tag compared to dedicated players.

However, many say that the picture quality of the unit is not at par with its stand-alone competition. Being a Playstation 3 owner, my eye caught the following headline in the latest edition of Home Cinema Choice Magazine. "Sony's PS3 is the best Blu-ray player you can buy." The headline was in a "Fact or Fiction" section of the magazine. Guess what: the magazine gave the notion a "Fiction" seal.

The reason they gave: "Increasingly, the Blu-ray performance of the PS3 doesn't really stand up to videophile scrutiny. While its excellent clarity and fine detail reproduction is without question, motion is not the console's strongest point. Fast panning shots in Sony's own flagship 'Casino Royale,' are prone to stutter, whereas the company's own dedicated players render the same scenes perfectly. It is also prone to visual artifacts not seen on the latest dedicated players."

A few comments before PS3 fans go crazy. This is not the first time I have heard this in direct comparison tests, and I have personally witnessed some of these artifacts on my own Playstation 3. Plus, I have found the missing 5.1 analog outs, Bluetooth remote not backlit, no DTS-HD Master Audio support, no IR receiver build in for multifunction remotes, power consumption, and form factor to be annoying as well in the way I use my player.

Personally, I knew that my PS3 would only be a temporary Blu-ray player of choice in my own main home theater setup. However, at the time there was no real competition to the unit in terms of price and features. With the Panasonic DMP BD30 and upcoming profile 2.0 players, the PS3 no longer seems the obvious choice unless you also want to use it for games.

So, if you are the kind of people who think about movies first and games later or perhaps never, it might be a good idea to stay cool and await this summer and fall's impressive line-up of dedicated Blu-ray players before going HD. Can't wait? Perhaps you should check out the Panasonic DMP BD30.

Personally, I'm waiting for Pioneer to go profile 2.0 before I replace my PS3.

Lastly, my comments should in no way be seen as an attack on the Playstation 3. I'm only trying to keep you all in the know and give you valuable information before upgrading to Blu-ray playback.

News Comments ::


You must be logged on My Town to use this service.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
December 2004
You know what's weird.....I use my PS3 at home on a 23" LCD TV and the picture quality is great. No problems, no glitching up, no stuttering. I take my PS3 to my dad's one weekend to test out his new plasma screen and I start noticing all kinds of crap on the image and stuttering. There was tons of jagged edges and it just looked really bad. I thought it was my dad's TV but after reading this, I guess it is the PS3. But since I only have a small TV in my room and I rarely see glitching on mine, I'll keep my PS3 until I get a bigger TV. Thanks for the report.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
I have not had ANY problems yet...

and my PS3 is hooked up to my 60" Pioneer KURO...
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
Thanks for the info Henning.

As a consumer that will get into the bluray market eventually, I'm glad to be waiting it out and see what the reviews say (not to mention price drops).

It looks like I'll be waiting for the Panasonic DMP BD50 coming out soon. If the reviews are good after a few months I'll seriously look at it.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
October 2007
I'm so happy I got the Panasonic!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
November 2007
Quote:
The reason they gave: "Increasingly, the Blu-ray performance of the PS3 doesn't really stand up to videophile scrutiny.

I'm not a 'videophile' geek by any means, but I know what I want in hi-def clarity. I've been satisfied with my 'viewing' in front of my 46-inch Samsung 1080p, playing blu-ray via PS3. This 'scrutiny' is a MATTER OF PERCEPTION vastly different for every person.

By far... STILL the best BANG for the BUCK.
My perception.

[Post edited by xplaytendo on Mar 25, 2008]
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
Quote:
By far... STILL the best BANG for the BUCK.
My perception.


AGREED!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
October 2007
That's the thing though, it's inconsistent. PlayStation 3 might work perfectly for you guys, and that's great. But if other owners are reporting these kinds of problems, I think it's good that consumers are aware that these kinds of problems exist.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
Quote:
PlayStation 3 might work perfectly for you guys, and that's great. But if other owners are reporting these kinds of problems, I think it's good that consumers are aware that these kinds of problems exist.


Agreed.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
August 2007
I agree too. Evidently the Panny is not without its own problems. CNET has posts/opinions from numerous consumers complaining about compatibility issues with Sammy displays...

Just sayin'...
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Member since:
July 2006
Samsung displays are problematic for some reason. Mostly due to HDMI issues.

You must be logged on My Town to reply to this topic.

Advertisement: