Search Movie Database for
Hide»

Theatrical Review of Untraceable

Theatrical Review of Untraceable
" I can imagine this being the first draft of the screenplay, but shooting material? There are still kinks to be worked out.

Theatrical review

By Jason P. Vargo
First published Jan 24, 2008

Connect to Facebook/Twitter, recommend via email and much more.

Bookmark and Share


The following review of "Untraceable" includes spoilers for the film. Proceed at your own risk.

Every couple of years, film tackles a perceived real life problem and exploits it. I´m not talking about wars or social causes; I´m talking technology or business. Remember "Antitrust," the 2001 warning against computer companies? Or how about "Cellular" and its near preaching about the potential of cell phones? Well, here comes "Untraceable," a movie in the same vein as the others: the use of tech against the populace, a warning of sorts…and ten years too late.

In the cyber crimes unit of the FBI, Jennifer Marsh (Diane Lane, a dead ringer for Mariska Hargitay) gets a tip about a new website featuring, at first, a dead cat. As human beings begin to disappear-and die-on the site, the stakes are raised. But how do you find a computer wizard who is playing in his own backyard?

I´m not quite sure what ran through the heads of the five credited writers of "Untraceable" which led a promising story into a dark abyss of nothingness in the last ten minutes. Maybe they ran out of time to craft a proper finale. Maybe something got cut in the editing room. I don´t know. But whatever did happen, it manages to suck the life out of the entire production. As if it weren´t bad enough most of the movie feels like behind the scenes on "To Catch a Predator," we´re introduced to our main character during an investigation. An investigation which takes a maximum of five minutes, including exposition. An investigation where Marsh pinpoints an identity thief, calls the local police and then correctly guesses there is a youngster in the house. Um, hello? Granted, she´s good…but that good? If she was, then this movie would have been over in half an hour.

But this beginning is something everyone forgets about, too, in this thinly veiled "Just Say No to Computer Crime" flick. They even jettison proper police work. When you know the identity of two different victims, the FIRST thing you do is try to find a connection. Friends, family, work, associates, interests-you get the idea. For whatever reason, no one in the crack Portland FBI office thinks of this until it´s entirely too late.

Wanna talk even more top notch police work? Marsh, apparently the lead investigator in the cyber crimes unit, was her home connected to a wireless network. Her home computer has access to work files. Both of which get hacked, unsurprisingly. Her actions, words and experiences don´t mesh together as they should through the movie, this being but one example.

One thing to watch out for in "Untraceable" are small throwaway lines, characters or scenes. Keep an eye (and ear) on Melanie as well as two detectives looking around Jennifer´s garage. In the first instance, a trick leads directly to a fellow agent´s death. (Does anyone really buy the voice Griffin Dowd hears on his phone is a real person? Of course it´s fake and a trap.) The latter, sadly, thinks it is being coy in setting up the climax, yet is so obviously transparent as nothing more than a story point it´s laughable. (Tell me director Gregory Hoblit doesn´t make the finale so easy to see coming a third grader could do it. I dare you.)

Some people will compare the bloody "Saw" franchise to this film and, in certain respects, they´d be right to. For as many inventive and creative deaths are featured in the horror films, "Untraceable" comes up with an idea they haven´t thought of yet: the more live stream views there are, the worse the punishment gets. For instance, with every passing internet viewer, sulfuric acid is added to a tub of water, burning a man. Or some others which are too delicious to spoil here. But, in the end, even "Saw" has a better rationale for killing than the dopey teenager in "Untraceable." Jigsaw, in his heart of hearts, wants his victims to be better people, see the error of their ways and repent. Owen Reilly (Joseph Cross) doesn´t have as altruistic a reason: he wants people to suffer online because his father´s suicide was replayed online for everyone to see. So he kills people associated with that event. And some others who have nothing at all to do with it…except tangentially. As he puts it, Marsh and her colleagues allowed his father´s name to be smeared in the virtual world and made him relive the horror every day.

I felt like standing up and asking him if he ever heard of the First Amendment. Ya know, freedom of speech and so on. Aside from the law, the reporters and news station covering and airing the suicide (not to mention the subsequent pirating of the footage) did not kill his father; Owen is killing people.

One of the great joys in cop shows is figuring out which of the people we´ve met on screen is the killer, following the connections until we hit the inevitable conclusion. Here, we don´t meet Owen for a fair while into the action and we can´t connect the dots until the cops do. Instead of being able to "play along" in the hunt, we have to be by standards, passive instead of active. And that´s actively boring.

"Untraceable" feels half baked, a good idea buried in 30 minutes of filler story material. Diane Lane and the rest of the cast do as good a job as they can be expected to do, considering the holes in the story. She presents herself as a take charge woman unafraid of battling anyone over any issue. In the tender moments with her daughter (of which there are too few), she manages to balance intensity with genuine love. The directing isn´t even a problem, though if we had to see another aerial view of Portland, I was going to scream. One is enough for any movie, but we have at least two, if not three. Long, nearly nauseating looks at downtown Portland, seemingly downtrodden and broken.

I can´t in any conscious recommend "Untraceable." Most of its misfires occur late in the narrative, yet they cast a pall over the entire production. I can imagine this being the first draft of the screenplay, but shooting material? There are still kinks to be worked out. As such, it gets a 4 out of 10.

Connect to Facebook/Twitter, recommend via email and much more.

Bookmark and Share



Discuss

ZipCrash

Jan 26, 2008 - CST 12:50 AM
ZipCrash
Member since:
September 2006
Pretty good review, I would agree with most of it expect this...

"In one of the more glaring examples of incompetence, her daughter and mother disappear from a motel room to set up the finale. Okay, fine, we´ve seen this approach a thousand times. Yet does she report their disappearance to her FBI buddies? Does she wait for backup before rushing off to find them? And, as if to compound character incompetence with script tomfoolery, neither the mother nor the daughter are brought back in any way, shape or form to resolve their story. Dead? Alive? Moved to Morocco? Who knows."

I don't know what movie (or cut) you watched but that never happened in the movie. Only scene that has to do with the motel room is when she is packing up her cat, which then leads the end. They were staying at different motels, hence the line that the mother and daughter were going to be a few hours of town and she was going to stay somewhere closer to work.

In any regard, I enjoyed the movie. There where some issues, which you mentioned but it was enjoyable and I rather liked the ending.

JJ79

Jan 26, 2008 - CST 9:00 AM
says... Also known as The Movie Rambler
JJ79
Member since:
January 2006
I was under the impression the hotel room the cat was in happened to be the one the mother and daughter were also at. My reasoning: what is the point of Jennifer going to the hotel to get the cat at all? It's not a major character in the film nor is it very important.

Supporting evidence: Jennifer either runs into the hotel room or out of the hotel room with her weapon drawn. She is manic when she gets in her car and goes over the bridge. Why are the mother and daughter not heard from for the rest of the movie?

Jason
[Post edited by JJ79 on Jan 26, 2008 - CST 9:05 AM]

ZipCrash

Jan 26, 2008 - CST 7:40 PM
ZipCrash
Member since:
September 2006
Well people care alot about their pets besides this was my understanding of the scene:

She told her boss she was only going to take a day off. So why leave the hotel at all? She approached the hotel calmly and then stopped while going into the door because she thought she heard something. Then she pulled out the gun. Once the room is clear she grabbed the cat and left. Like she realized she needed to go somewhere else. There was never anything to suggest that he nabbed the family, nothing at all. He went after her, not her family. If he had her family why go through the trouble of setting up the trap on the bridge?

JJ79

Jan 26, 2008 - CST 8:27 PM
says... Also known as The Movie Rambler
JJ79
Member since:
January 2006
I won't dispute I could have misinterpreted what happened. However, why did Owen put the camera on Jennifer's house in the first place? Why did he control the camera and put it on the kid for everyone to see? Yes, he did mockingly ask the watchers if they thought he would honestly let them hurt a child but the fact remains he put the camera outside the house and followed the daughter.

Jason

ZipCrash

Jan 27, 2008 - CST 12:24 AM
ZipCrash
Member since:
September 2006
Why would anybody go to that extremes to make a point? It's a movie, that scene just basically served to create tension and suspense. The movie certainly wasn't perfect but I did find it refreshing to see a movie that had alot of computer hacking in it actually have a grounding in reality (Hackers, The Net are bad examples). Most movies don't even go off a real OS, just some fake flash thing. In this you could actually see them using Windows Vista, the computer lingo was correct, and the characters actually acted like they knew how to use a computer (characters typed fast and didn't look at the keyboard). The movie wasn't perfect in that regard either (for example I can think of a few more things to try to trace the computer and I'm not even a hacker) but it was a step in the right direction for Hollywood.

Want to make a post? Log on with a free my town account.


Get this site ad-free »