Warner: No BD-Live Blu-ray titles this year
" Warner: No BD-Live Blu-ray titles this year.
Connect to Facebook/Twitter, recommend via email and much more.
Warner Bros. do not believe that consumers want BD-Live before they really can make a difference.
This was made clear in London at a "Driving Digital Content" conference recently.
"Every studio is working on BD-Live, but it will have to be something absolutely mind-boggling for consumers to get excited" said Marc Gareton, Vice President of Warner Bros. International. So people should not expect to see any BD-Live titles from the studio in 2008 he concluded.
He said that he was happy with the performance of Blu-ray in general but that it was harder to sell catalog titles than it was on DVD. He said an option could be to include a "Free" digital copy so people got more choices should they decide to upgrade old titles to HD.
Source: HCC Magazine.
Connect to Facebook/Twitter, recommend via email and much more.
Latest headlines
Countdown to Katie and Michelle: four days! »
Nov 6, 2009
The Canyon comes to DVD and Video-on-Demand »
Nov 4, 2009
The Little Indie That Could »
Nov 4, 2009
Cooper stamps still available from the USPS »
Nov 2, 2009
Full Theatrical Trailer for Avatar Online »
Oct 29, 2009

rangoonth
February 2008
My links
View profile »Tim Raynor
March 2002
My links
View profile »View collection »
View wish list »
bladerunner1
March 2008
My links
View profile »OR...maybe they just don't care anymore? A recent Harris poll suggested that only 9% of those surveyed, (that didn't already own one or the other format)were even interested in BR. Infact, the real "Format War" has only just begun. I got my chips on DVD.
[Post edited by bladerunner1 on Jul 10, 2008 - CDT 4:47 PM]
Falcon01
July 2006
My links
View profile »View collection »
I'm guessing Warners decision is because they either think Web enabled content is not big enough at the moment to warrant the added costs or they just want to re-release the movies again later on with web content so people may end up getting the movie twice.
Actually I just thought of something. Warner may be waiting to see how far they can go with web enabled content therefore they don't want to put anything on the discs for now because it's still in it's infancy?
Just thinking out loud.
bladerunner1
March 2008
My links
View profile »No. not really falcon. It has its share of problems too. It will not transmit the advanced audio codecs in their native bitstream. It lacks multichannel analog outputs, for those people (like myself) that have older equipment,(and likes such equipment). And the SD upconversion is "OK" at best.
BUT..it is the "safest" player to buy at this time because it also plays games and does all kinds of other stuff too.
[Post edited by bladerunner1 on Jul 10, 2008 - CDT 4:55 PM]
ReaggieP
January 2008
My links
View profile »Skyhawk
October 2007
My links
View profile »Falcon01
July 2006
My links
View profile »View collection »
Warner released a few HD DVD's with web content. I believe Universal was getting into it also.
John J. Puccio
March 2002
My links
View profile »View collection »
I never connected either of my Toshiba players to the Web and never regretted it.
John
Skyhawk
October 2007
My links
View profile »To be honest Falcon, the only HD DVD "live" content I saw was Transformers. I didn't revisit it. Then I tried the Sony basic generic Internet menu (once). I've never bothered with Internet content since.
The fact is that a very small percentage of HDTV owners likely have their entire house network wired (well especially their living room, or wherever their HDTV is located). And an even smaller percentage of them will find the Internet features compelling enough to be used.
I consider myself rather "up" on technology, and I'm an early adopter and love toys. I have a dedicated HT room, 130" 1080p projector, with Internet. But if I don't find this feature compelling enough to use on either format, who does?
BTW, I don't even do the PiP stuff. Like who in their right mind is going to re-watch the movie with a darn pop-up window over it? If I like a movie enough, I'll watch a few special features after - not in a little window while rewatching, and feature specials in HD quality is good!
Personally, I just wish Warner took more care with their transfers and offered everything with lossless sound. But I really suspect they're decision is based on "cost-benefit" rather than HDi versus BD-J (other companies can do it for them after all), but rather from their earlier experience with similar features on HD DVD that were largely unutilized.