It's lightweight fun for the kid in all of us, but I would emphasize the word lightweight.
Tools:
Send to a friend »
"Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" --Optimus Prime
Note: In the follow joint review, John Puccio and Jason Vargo both wrote up their comments on the movie, with John also writing up the Video, Audio, Extras, and Parting Thoughts.
The Movie According to John:
A caution: If you are fourteen years of age or younger, or if you grew up as a fan of the Transformers action figures or animated TV series, you will want to ignore my review and skip immediately down to Jason's slightly more positive comments. That's because you will love this new, live-action, CGI "Transformers" movie. It's explosive, colorful, fast-paced, and eye-catching, everything you could possibly want from the franchise. However, if you are an adult and not already a Transformers fan, you may find the movie more than a bit long, loud, and frenzied.
I remember back in the 1980s visiting a toy shop in Carmel, CA, and seeing several huge Transformer figures, about two or three-feet tall and extremely well detailed, and thinking how great they looked. But then I wondered what I would do with such a plaything if I ever bought one, and after looking at the price tags I abandoned the idea altogether. But comparisons with the current movie are apt. Both the superdeluxe toy and the new movie look great--colorful and complex--and they would both probably be fun to look at for a time; yet both of them are essentially empty and devoid of much entertainment value except as transitory showpieces. Still, a momentary diversion is all that "Transformers" strives for, and for the most part it succeeds.
When Machines Turn Bad:
The plot involves two sets of thinking robotic machines, one set good, the other set bad, both groups capable of morphing their shapes into any number of other mechanical objects. They come to Earth looking for something called an Allspark, a space cube capable of generating enough energy to destroy or recreate entire worlds. Caught in the middle of this technological tug-of-war is a teenager, Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBeouf), who, inadvertently and reluctantly, takes sides with the good guys, Optimus Prime and the Autobots, against the baddies, Megatron and the Decepticons.
I have no objection to this cataclysmic story line. What I object to is that the movie is way, way too long, the final battle going on for at least forty-five hectic minutes. I found myself fidgeting by the second half of the film and almost nodding off during the climactic shoot-out.
When Directors Turn Bad:
Michael Bay directed "Transformers." Some of his previous films include "Bad Boys" and "Bad Boys II," "Armageddon," "The Rock," and "Pearl Harbor." In his favor, I liked the excesses of "The Rock," for me the only one of Bay's films that succeeded. Otherwise, he tends to overindulge himself. Whatever works in a film he does again and again within the same film. For example, there is enough eye candy in "Transformers" to satisfy anybody's fun factor for at least a lifetime, and the Transformers' CGI transformations look splendid. At least, the first few times we see it done. Unfortunately, Bay seems to think that since it looked good once, he should repeat it unto the threshold of pain, so we get to see virtually the same transformations about 800 times. By the end of the movie, they become little more than a yawn.
As I said before, I think maybe you either have to be very young or have to have grown up with the Transformers franchise in the 80s to appreciate the film fully. The audience I saw it with in a theater were equally divided between younger children and men in their late twenties and thirties, and both groups seemed to be enjoying themselves. As an old fart, though, I found the movie gaudy, blaring, frenetic, and, as I say, long. At almost two-and-a-half hours, it overstays its welcome by a good thirty minutes.
Anyway, what should I have expected? It's a movie based on a series of toys and cartoons. Darn right it's going to be juvenile and cartoony. What I didn't expect, though, was the movie's huge similarity to "Independence Day." There's the same interweaving of multiple plot strands and several sets of characters, all of them coming together at the end, and there's even the same government cover-up of alien technology involved.
Shia LaBeouf is good as Sam Witwicky, the ordinary, put-upon teenager caught up in extraordinary events. Kevin Dunn and Julie White are fittingly moronic as Sam's parents. In teen comedies, you'll remember, parents are either idiots or completely absent from the picture. Megan Fox as Sam's friend Mikaela is appropriately foxy. Josh Duhamel as Captain Lennox is acceptably heroic in a second plot strand. Rachel Taylor and Anthony Anderson almost disappear from the movie after making brief appearances in what might have been the beginnings of yet another subplot that was discarded partway through the script. John Voight keeps a straight face as the Secretary of Defense, John Keller (anyway, a straighter face than Donald Rumsfeld would have managed). Bernie Mac has a cute bit part early on as a used-car salesman. And thank goodness for John Turturro as an uptight government agent, because he seems like the only actor in the picture who realized the whole affair probably started out as a campy, tongue-in-cheek thriller instead of the dead-serious movie or outright comedy that most of the cast play it for.
Despite my reservations, I have to admit that "Transformers" turned out better than I expected, but it's still no award winner. Sure, it's lightweight fun for the kid in all of us, but I would emphasize the word "lightweight." 6/10
The Movie According to Jason:
In a summer of $200,000,000 comedies ("Evan Almighty") and $300,000,000 action spectacles ("Spider-Man 3"), one film flew under the radar, relatively speaking. "Transformers," the second big-screen adaptation of the Hasbro toy line about two sets of vehicle morphing robots, delivers in all the places that spiders, pirates, and surfers couldn't: It's a crowd pleasing, rock ´em, sock ´em, explosion laden 144-minutes with no pretense of being anything more than it is.
In all honesty, the "Star Trek," Borg cube-inspired Allspark is the MacGuffin in this story, conveniently dropped into the plot as an excuse to watch cars turned into robots, those robots fire rockets and missiles and energy weapons at each other while puny humans carry on like it's the end of the world. Knowing this, how deep a story can an audience reasonably expect? Not very. But we don't go to any film based on a 1980s cartoon, let alone a Bay film, to be wowed by superior acting or a revolutionary script. We go to see stuff blown up really good. And, on that count, "Transformers" delivers the goods better than any pure action movie of the last five years.
Every aspect of the film is a wonder to behold, not just the buildings when weapon blasts eat out chunks of their sides or the massive robots wrestling with each other in Ultimate Fighting Championship-type encounters. Either Industrial Light and Magic has progressed leaps and bounds beyond the effects houses that handled "Spider-Man 3" and "Pirates of the Caribbean," or those other outfits are grossly incompetent. From a rational standpoint, there is no way that what is on screen could come from miniatures or stop motion. But from a moviemaking standpoint, how can Spider-Man swinging through the streets of New York look so obviously fake and cartoonish, yet the Autobots and Decepticons so convincingly real?
They blend in with their surroundings so completely and interact so flawlessly with the human actors that it's not outside the realm of possibility the production team assembled full-size robots for every sequence in the picture. There are no jerky movements, not so much as a detail out of place. Scorch marks, dents, dings…even the way each individual gear moves when one of the Transformers walks. The effects are bar none the best we've seen this year, outside of "300."
Even the actors fulfill their end of the bargain. Of course, they're not asked to do a whole lot besides run, jump, slide, yell, and pull triggers. With Josh Duhamel (TV´s "Las Vegas"), Tyrese Gibson, Anthony Anderson, Jon Voight, John Turturro, and Bernie Mac, a cast which reminds us more of "Armageddon" than "The Rock," takes shape. Without fail, everyone in the film does what they were contracted to do: Duhamel provides the good-looking poster boy; Mac provides a welcome breath of humor early on; Voight is his patented bewildered government official (here the Secretary of Defense); and Turturro is the man we all love to hate.
But the majority of the acting duties fall to LaBeouf, who scored a role in "Indiana Jones IV" based on his work here. The reason is pretty obvious. He can go from a regular teenager worried about getting a car and a girl to near action hero in three seconds flat, pulling off both roles with equal authority. And he makes us believe every quick-thinking quip really comes to him in the spur of the moment, as opposed to being the brainchild of scriptwriters. LaBeouf can headline a summer action movie like this one, and he can anchor a good drama like "Disturbia." With the right mix of films in his future, he should have a long career in Hollywood.
Average user rating (1-5):